The term “penny stock” generally refers to stocks that trade below five dollars per share, or that were issued by small companies with limited revenue. The trading market for penny stocks is thin, and is usually dominated by one or two brokerage firms who have an interest in the companies’ stock.

Penny stocks are considered speculative, and the SEC requires that brokerage firms document a customer’s “suitability”, and obtain a signed written agreement prior to engaging in penny stock transactions. Broker dealers are also required to provide customers with a risk disclosure document concerning the risk of the penny stock market.

Penny stocks are frequent the targets of “pump and dump” schemes where a brokerage firm with a large position, or a favored client, aggressively tout the stock, which causes a dramatic rise in price, during which the brokerage firm or its preferred client, sell their shares into the market. When the selling is concluded, and the firm moves on to their next target stock, there is little to support the price of the penny stock, and it gradually (sometimes violently) drops in price.

Most investments purchased by customers can be easily sold with just a phone call. Stocks, bonds and mutual funds trade on transparent exchanges where brokerage firms are obligated to get the best price for their customers.

But some investments don’t trade on an exchange, leaving investors at the mercy of the companies’ redemption program, or third party auction houses.

Over the past ten years many advisors pitched non traded real estate investment trusts, or REITs, promissory note type investments, oil and gas private placements, equipment leasing deals and a variety of other non-traded, illiquid investments. These were often described as income generating investments, not subject to stock market risk.

FIRNA is an acronym for the financial industry regulatory authority.

FINRA is a not for profit organization, authorized by congress to oversee the regulation of investment professionals. FINRA writes and enforces rules of conduct governing brokerage firms and registered representatives. They oversee the licensing of investment professionals, and conduct audits and investigations to ensure that the firms and individuals remain in compliance with the securities laws.

FINRA also operates the largest arbitration forum in the country, where investment related disputes are heard and decided.

Every broker dealer has a duty to establish and enforce an effective supervisory system designed to prevent violations of the securities laws. FINRA Rule 3110 sets out the requirements for establishing and implementing a supervisory system.

The branch manager and the chief compliance officer have a multitude of duties and responsibilities to make sure that the firm’s registered representatives are observing “high standards of commercial honor” in dealing with customers. Among their duties are ensuring that a client’s opening account documents are properly completed; approving the daily transactions, periodically reviewing transactions for suitability and following up on “red flags” or indications of wrongdoing.

Failure to supervise is one of the most commonly brought claims in FINRA arbitrations. On the regulatory side FINRA referred more than 700 fraud cases for prosecution in 2014 and levied more than $166 million in fines.  Most of these cases involved a breakdown in the supervision chain at the broker dealer level.

Before an investment can be offered to investors a licensed FINRA broker dealer has an affirmative obligation to investigate the product being sold. For large cap publicly traded stocks the investigation might simply be insuring the company is current in its SEC filings. For private placement investments, the due diligence requirement is more substantial.

On private placement investments like REITs, oil and gas programs and other “con conventional investments, broker dealers have an affirmative duty to challenge the assumptions in the offering documents provided by the sponsor of the investments. This might entail hiring an independent company to review the financials, visiting the company’s headquarters or place of business site to “eyeball” the operations, and a reviewing credit reports, the track record of the sponsor, and any other documents to help gain a better understanding of whether the company is on sound financial footing.

It is not sufficient for a broker dealer to simply rely on the representations and written materials provided by the sponsor, which clearly has a conflict of interest in providing the materials to a broker dealer. A broker dealer must conduct a thorough and independent investigation prior to offering a private placement to investors.   FINRA Notices to Members NTM 03-71, NTM 05-18 and NTM 10-22 all discuss the duties of broker dealers to undertake a vigorous investigation into the investments they approve for sale.

 

Excessive trading, sometimes called churning occurs when a financial advisor, exercising control over an investor’s account engages in transactions which are excessive in size and scope to the needs and objectives of the client for the purpose of generating commissions.

Churning generally occurs in accounts where the financial advisor has discretionary authority, or authorization to make transactions without first consulting with the client. Excessive trading also occurs in accounts where a client does not follow the trading closely. This gives unethical financial advisors the opportunity to make unnecessary and inappropriate transactions.

A rule of thumb to measure churning is the generally accepted “Six Times Turnover” Rule. If an account’s equity has been turned over six times in the course of a year, with the financial advisor making all or most of the transactions, there is a presumption the account has been churned. Put plainly, if an account is worth, on average, $100,000 over the course of the year, and $600,000 in purchases were made on that $100,000 net equity (not counting margin) then the account turnover rate would be 6X: $600,000 /$100,000.

There are a number of instances where investment losses are recoverable. These cases fall broadly under three categories: excessive trading, unsuitable investments and misrepresentations. These are discussed more fully under the topic “What Types of Investment Losses are Recoverable.

Most people are unaware that investment losses can be recovered; they write off losses as imprudent decisions, or feel helpless and foolish for having had their trust betrayed. While not all losses are recoverable, the important thing is to speak to an experienced securities attorney as soon as you suspect wrongdoing. A careful analysis, including determining when the statutes of limitations are triggered is essential to evaluating any claim.

Where to Begin

Aaron Parthemer a former registered representative with Morgan Stanley and Wells Fargo was barred from the securities industry on March 6, 2015. In their complaint, which Aaron Parthemer neither admitted nor denied, FINRA found that Parthemer engaged in private securities transactions without obtaining written approval from his broker dealer, and then made misrepresentations to FINRA in the course of FINRA’s investigation into Aaron Parthemer’s outside business activities.

Aaron Parthemer’s licensing and disciplinary history with FINRA

Aaron Parthemer is not currently licensed as of October, 2015, but was licensed with the following FINRA firms

FINRA Dispute Resolution reports that through March 2012 new cases filed are down eight percent year over year from 2011.  

There were a total of 4,727 cases filed in 2011 which was down from 5,680 in 2010.

Through March 2012 variable annuity claims were the most common type of claim filed with a total of 212, an amount which equaled the total number of VA claims for all of 2011.

Also in 2012 the customer win rate has shot up to 51% an increase from the 44% reported for 2011.  FINRA also reported that for 2011 customers received monetary compensation via an award or through a monetary settlement in 74% of cases

In publishing Regulatory Notice 12-03 FINRA called on broker dealers to increase supervision and compliance when dealing with complex products.”  These investments include any security or strategy with “novel, complicated or intricate derivative like features.”  Examples are asset backed securities, unlisted REITs, structured notes, leveraged and inverse ETFs.

This notice is the latest in a long line of regulatory notices on complex products that began with 03-07 and 03-71 (dealing with non conventional investments) and continuing with 05-18 and 05-26.

Firms must first perform a “reasonable basis” suitability analysis on the product using independent resources.  As part of this process 12-03 requires firms to thoroughly “vet” the product by looking into the assumptions underlying the success of the product to determine how sound it is in light of macro and micro factors.  Firms are also required to keep kicking the tires after sales commence and to “periodically reassess” whether the performance and risk profile remain consistent with the manner in which the firm is selling the product. 
Contact Information